The controversy over the recent article “30 Grams or less: students get school in state pot law” spawned an array of arguments among the student body, who seemed collectively outraged that The Sojourn would run this story. I disagree with the notion that this article was inappropriate and unwarranted.
The Sojourn staff has a real-world duty, as journalists, to present the news to the student body, no matter how sensitive the subject may be. The only issue with their work arises from students and faculty who would rather ignore the dark underbelly of the university, saving face all the while.
Several student comments on the online article focused on the idea that The Sojourn should show Christ’s love to those pot-smoking boys by leaving the story unrepresented via the professional outlet of the student newspaper. This notion is absurd at best.
If you, student or faculty, can remove yourself from the supposition that the university should have the ability to eliminate the responsibility of any student criminal to face the inconvenient consequences of illegal activity, then you might understand what a ludicrous idea it is to forgive and forget in this situation.
The boys involved in this story have gotten exponentially better treatment than any ordinary street criminal would have. In a true-to-the-law scenario, these boys would have had their mug shots plastered all over The Chronicle-Tribune, faced jail time, fines, probation, a court case and they may have even lost their jobs. But should the power of Christ’s love compel you to allow people to disregard these consequences thus empowering a false sense of real responsibility and giving greater momentum to their perpetual adolescence?
The very act of allowing these boys to bypass the real consequences of a real crime, brought on by their own foolishness, can breed subconscious ideas that they may never have to face the tumultuous aftermath of irresponsible choices. And that is a greater disservice to these boys than forcing them to face their choices with a chance to understand just how asinine their actions were.
I could only hope that the university would want to prepare the students for a life after college that most definitely and generously distributes responsibilities with serious consequences. If this isn’t the case, I’m going to assume the university better suited for day care than intellectual development.


