You may not have received the memo, but Facebook is keeping track of what you say regarding the 2012 presidential campaign.
Facebook announced, “Every post and comment both public and private – by a U.S. user that mentions a presidential candidate’s name will be fed through a sentiment analysis tool that spits out anonymized measures of the general U.S. Facebook population,” according to the American Civil Liberties Union’s Blog of Rights.
This information, along with reader polls, is being shared with Politico.com to gather opinions of Facebook users regarding the presidential campaign.
“My initial reactions are, ‘Are you serious? They’re going to be searching through my private posts to find political sentiment?’ And then I realized I don’t even know what I agreed to when I clicked that I agreed [with] the Terms of Service,” said Patrick Fischl (sr).
Fischl said he doesn’t post political opinions on his own profile. He said he has been willing to chime in with his opinions on other users’ profiles, but the recent privacy changes will affect his readiness to do so.
“I’m sure it’s some animated computer program they have running, but it still seems kind of creepy to me,” said Fischl.
Erik Fisher, Indiana Wesleyan University’s social media manager, said that since all the information ends up anonymous, he doesn’t have much of a problem with the study.
“If I were to say I was pro or against any certain candidate, it’s not going to say that it’s attributed to [me], so I didn’t really have a problem with it, per se,” said Fisher.
Hannah Pate (sr) and Zach Roth (so) voiced their lack of trust of Facebook and questioned why a wider announcement wasn’t made.
“What are the motives here? Why did you not tell your users? What are you hiding?” asked Pate.
“If it’s innocent, why shouldn’t they tell them?” asked Roth.
Fisher said it’s Facebook’s responsibility to inform its users of privacy changes.
“When it comes to major decisions like that, even though it’s going to become an anonymized thing, Facebook should give notice to their users as to what they’re doing,” said Fisher.
Fisher predicts that there will be a variety of reactions to the new policy.
“I think there will be some people who will be scared and maybe be angry with Facebook for choosing to do that. Others will probably see that it’s anonymous and not care either way. And there’s probably a third instance where these are people who don’t care about politics at all, and it doesn’t affect them,” said Fisher.
Both Roth and Pate said the tracking won’t affect what they post on Facebook.
“It doesn’t really scare me. I don’t care. I’m going to say what I believe and use Facebook as a tool to educate people about the mistaken privacy laws of Facebook,” said Roth.
“I don’t care if they track me or not,” said Pate. “It’s not going to change my opinion.”
Roth explained that trying to navigate and understand terms of service of social networks is often a lost cause.
“It’s confusing as laws are, so that makes it permissible for just about anything. And it’s like the length of the Bible,” said Roth.
“Even when we sign our housing form for IWU, the lifestyle agreement that we sign, that’s the exact same thing as user agreements. I doubt anyone ever reads that whole thing. We don’t know what we’re being held accountable [for] and what we’re putting ourselves in the way of,” said Fischl. “With IWU, I’m sure there’s a lot of students who don’t know what rules they are breaking because they don’t read that user agreement.”


